Every project has that one article, usually on someone else’s blog, that explains the chain better than the project’s own docs. I write articles like that, and projects can hire me to write them on purpose.
I’m Lana, CryptoHedwig is my site. The rule I work under is boring but expensive: I read the original material before writing a word about it. Docs, explorers, governance forums, the code itself. Not a tweet thread about the code.
Velas Network, 2020 to 2023: validator onboarding, a grant program run end to end, investor decks, and the kind of documentation that only gets read when a chain misbehaves. Since 2023 I write for DAIC Capital, 150+ published pieces across research, guides and explainers. Before that, wallet and exchange documentation. My research pipeline is AI-assisted and human-edited; LLMs speed up collection, they never make claims.
What projects end up asking for, roughly.
Research deep-dives
Mechanisms, upgrades, token economics. The kind of piece where a smart outsider can repeat your idea at dinner without a glossary first.
Documentation and manuals
Staking guides, validator runbooks, wallet flows. The bar is a stranger finishing the task without opening a Telegram chat.
Comparisons and positioning
For the category with twenty competitors where every one of them claims to lead. I keep the 27-chain comparison table here, so I have watched how status labels and on-chain reality drift apart over a year, on all sides. The service is telling you where your chain sits before a stranger does it for free.
One-pagers and decks
For investors, partners, grant committees. Sourced claims, no revolutionary synergy.
Content audits
Your published material checked line by line against the original docs, specs and announcements. You get three lists: what survives, what needs a better source, what should be retired before it ages badly.
How it goes. A brief, then I read the sources, then you get a draft with the sources attached to the claims. Depth decides the timeline, one to three weeks usually.
Recent work.
Blockchain Wind-Downs 2026
A year of chain closures and relocations, every row linked to the project’s own announcement.
The comparison table
27 chains, live TVL, statuses that move when the evidence moves.
Beyond the x402 Hype
What agent payment rails actually settle, read from the ledger rather than from the roadmaps.
Questions that come up before the first invoice.
Will our work appear on this site?
By default, no. Client work stays private. If I would like to feature a piece here later, I ask first, and no is a complete answer. An NDA signed before the brief is normal.
How many revisions?
Two rounds are included. Drafts arrive with sources attached, so revisions shape the tone rather than repair the facts.
Can we see a sample first?
The blog is the sample. Everything here is public and checkable, that is the point of having a site. If you want something shaped to your problem before committing, a paid pilot piece is the fair way to start.
How does payment work?
By agreement. What matters to me is a formal setup: written scope, invoice, traceable payment. The exact format we settle together.
Start the conversation. Tell me what your users keep misunderstanding. That is the whole brief.
Currently taking one or two projects a month. Reply within 48 hours.
The recommendations live on my LinkedIn profile.